Brayton Cycle (Gas Turbine) Simulator
Interactive Brayton cycle simulator with P-v and T-s diagrams, regeneration, intercooling, reheating options, and component visualization. Analyze gas turbine efficiency, back work ratio, and net power output for power generation and jet propulsion.
Loading simulation...
Loading simulation, please waitBrayton Cycle (Gas Turbine) Simulator
✓ Verified Content: All equations, formulas, and reference data in this simulation have been verified by the Simulations4All engineering team against authoritative sources including MIT OpenCourseWare thermodynamics courses, NASA Glenn Research Center technical documentation, and the Engineering Toolbox. See verification log
Quick Answer
What is the Brayton cycle? The Brayton cycle is the thermodynamic cycle for gas turbines and jet engines, consisting of: isentropic compression, constant-pressure heat addition, isentropic expansion, and constant-pressure heat rejection. Efficiency is η = 1 - (1/rp)^((γ-1)/γ) where rp is the pressure ratio and γ ≈ 1.4 for air. Higher pressure ratios increase efficiency but require higher turbine inlet temperatures. This simulation analyzes simple cycles plus advanced configurations with regeneration, intercooling, and reheating.
Introduction
Your car's engine wastes about 75% of the fuel's energy as heat. A well-designed gas turbine does better, converting up to 45% into useful work, and when combined with a steam bottoming cycle, modern combined-cycle plants push past 60% efficiency. The difference between mediocre and excellent efficiency in gas turbines comes down to understanding the Brayton cycle and the energy budgets within each component.
The Brayton cycle forms the theoretical foundation for all gas turbine engines, from the massive turbines generating electricity at power plants to the jet engines propelling aircraft at 900 km/h. George Brayton patented his constant-pressure engine in 1872, and the thermodynamic cycle he described remains the basis for analyzing gas turbine performance over 150 years later [1].
This simulator lets you explore how pressure ratio, turbine inlet temperature, and component efficiencies affect gas turbine performance. Engineering students preparing for thermodynamics exams will find the real vs. ideal cycle comparison illuminating. Practicing engineers can use the regeneration, intercooling, and reheating options to evaluate advanced cycle configurations for power plant design.
How to Use This Simulator
Quick Start Guide
- Select a Preset - Choose "Simple Cycle" for basic gas turbine analysis, "With Regeneration" to see recuperator benefits, "Jet Engine" for aircraft propulsion parameters, or "Advanced Cycle" for combined intercooling and reheating
- Adjust Pressure Ratio - Use the slider to set the compressor pressure ratio (2 to 30)
- Set Temperatures - Configure inlet temperature (T1) and maximum turbine inlet temperature (T3)
- View Diagrams - Switch between T-s and P-v diagrams to visualize the cycle
- Enable Enhancements - Check boxes to add regeneration, intercooling, or reheating and observe efficiency changes
Controls Reference
- Pressure Ratio (rp): Compressor outlet pressure divided by inlet pressure
- Inlet Temperature (T1): Air temperature entering the compressor
- Max Temperature (T3): Turbine inlet temperature (limited by blade materials)
- Compressor Efficiency: Isentropic efficiency of the compressor
- Turbine Efficiency: Isentropic efficiency of the turbine
- Regeneration: Enables heat recovery from exhaust gases
- Intercooling: Reduces compressor work via intermediate cooling
- Reheating: Increases turbine work via intermediate reheating
Keyboard Shortcuts
- ← → Arrow Keys: Adjust pressure ratio by 1
- Shift + Arrow Keys: Fine adjustment of 0.5
Tips for Best Results
- Start with the "Simple Cycle" preset to establish baseline performance
- Watch the back work ratio, which is much higher for gas turbines than steam cycles
- Enable regeneration at lower pressure ratios (rp < 10) for maximum benefit
- Compare ideal efficiency with actual efficiency to see component loss impacts
What Is the Brayton Cycle?
The Brayton cycle describes the thermodynamic processes in a gas turbine engine. In its ideal form, it consists of four processes: isentropic compression (1-2), constant-pressure heat addition (2-3), isentropic expansion (3-4), and constant-pressure heat rejection (4-1) [2]. The cycle operates as an open system in most practical applications, with ambient air continuously entering the compressor and combustion products exhausting to atmosphere.
Unlike the Rankine cycle used in steam power plants where the working fluid changes phase, the Brayton cycle uses air that remains gaseous throughout. The practical consequence is a much higher back work ratio, typically 40-80% compared to just 1-2% for steam cycles. The compressor consumes a large fraction of the turbine's output, leaving less net work available [3].
How the Simulator Works
| Parameter | Symbol | Range | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pressure Ratio | rp | 2 - 30 | Higher → Higher ideal efficiency but more compression work |
| Inlet Temperature | T1 | 280 - 330 K | Lower → Higher efficiency (colder air) |
| Max Temperature | T3 | 1000 - 1800 K | Higher → More work output (limited by materials) |
| Compressor Efficiency | ηc | 70 - 100% | Higher → Lower compression losses |
| Turbine Efficiency | ηt | 70 - 100% | Higher → More work extracted |
| Regenerator Effectiveness | ε | 50 - 95% | Higher → More heat recovered from exhaust |
The Ideal Brayton Cycle
The ideal Brayton cycle efficiency depends only on the pressure ratio and the specific heat ratio of the working gas. For air with γ = 1.4, the thermal efficiency is given by [4]:
η = 1 - 1/rp^((γ-1)/γ) = 1 - 1/rp^0.286
At a pressure ratio of 10, ideal efficiency reaches 48.2%. At rp = 20, it climbs to 57.5%. However, this idealized analysis ignores component inefficiencies, pressure losses, and practical temperature limits that reduce real-world performance significantly.
The key insight from the ideal cycle is that efficiency depends entirely on the temperature ratio across the compressor, which equals the pressure ratio raised to the (γ-1)/γ power. Experienced engineers recognize that while higher pressure ratios improve efficiency, they also increase compressor complexity and cost [5].
Real Cycle Effects
Real gas turbines deviate from ideal behavior in several important ways. Compressors and turbines are not isentropic, with typical isentropic efficiencies of 85-92%. These irreversibilities generate entropy and reduce the net work output.
For the compressor, the actual exit temperature T2 is higher than the isentropic value T2s:
T2 = T1 + (T2s - T1)/ηc
For the turbine, the actual exit temperature T4 is higher than the isentropic value:
T4 = T3 - ηt(T3 - T4s)
The combined effect of these inefficiencies can reduce cycle efficiency by 10-15 percentage points compared to the ideal case [6]. You will notice that as you reduce component efficiencies in the simulator, the gap between heat input and useful work output widens considerably.
Advanced Cycle Modifications
Regeneration
When turbine exhaust temperature T4 exceeds compressor discharge temperature T2, we can recover some of that thermal energy using a regenerator (also called a recuperator). The hot exhaust gases preheat the compressed air before it enters the combustor, reducing fuel consumption.
Regenerator effectiveness ε defines how much of the available temperature difference is actually transferred:
T5 = T2 + ε(T4 - T2)
Where T5 is the temperature of compressed air after the regenerator. Regeneration works best at lower pressure ratios where T4 > T2 by a significant margin. At very high pressure ratios, T2 approaches or exceeds T4, making regeneration ineffective or impossible [7].
Intercooling
Multi-stage compression with intercooling reduces the total work required for compression. By cooling the air between compression stages, we keep the compressor inlet temperature low for each stage. The ideal case approaches isothermal compression, which requires minimum work.
In practice, intercooling alone does not necessarily improve thermal efficiency because the cooled air requires more heat addition in the combustor. However, when combined with regeneration, intercooling can significantly improve overall cycle efficiency [8].
Reheating
Similar to intercooling, reheating involves multiple expansion stages with combustion between them. The turbine expands the gas partially, then additional fuel is burned at constant pressure before further expansion. Like intercooling, reheating by itself may not improve efficiency, but combined with regeneration it provides substantial gains.
Back Work Ratio: The Gas Turbine Challenge
The back work ratio (BWR) measures what fraction of turbine output is consumed by the compressor:
BWR = Wc/Wt
For gas turbines, this ratio typically falls between 40% and 80%, meaning only 20-60% of turbine work appears as net output. Compare this to steam power plants where the feedwater pump consumes only 1-2% of turbine output [9].
The high back work ratio makes gas turbines particularly sensitive to component efficiency. A 1% decrease in compressor efficiency might cause a 2-3% decrease in net power output. This sensitivity is why gas turbine manufacturers invest heavily in advanced compressor and turbine blade designs.
Learning Objectives
After completing this simulation, you should be able to:
- Calculate ideal Brayton cycle efficiency from pressure ratio and specific heat ratio
- Explain how compressor and turbine inefficiencies affect real cycle performance
- Determine when regeneration improves cycle efficiency based on T4 vs T2
- Calculate back work ratio and explain why it matters for gas turbines
- Compare simple, regenerative, and advanced gas turbine cycles
- Identify the temperature limits that constrain turbine inlet conditions
Exploration Activities
Activity 1: Pressure Ratio Optimization
Objective: Find the pressure ratio that maximizes net work output
Steps:
- Set T1 = 300 K, T3 = 1400 K, compressor efficiency = 85%, turbine efficiency = 90%
- Record net work output (Wnet) at pressure ratios of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25
- Plot Wnet vs. pressure ratio
- Identify the optimal pressure ratio for maximum net work
Expected Result: Net work peaks at an intermediate pressure ratio (typically 10-15 for these conditions). At very low rp, efficiency suffers. At very high rp, compression work becomes excessive.
Activity 2: Regeneration Effectiveness
Objective: Understand when regeneration helps and when it does not
Steps:
- Disable all enhancements, set rp = 6
- Record efficiency and note T2 and T4 values
- Enable regeneration at 80% effectiveness
- Observe efficiency change
- Increase pressure ratio to 20 and repeat
Expected Result: At rp = 6, T4 > T2 significantly, and regeneration improves efficiency by 5-10 percentage points. At rp = 20, T2 approaches T4, making regeneration less beneficial.
Activity 3: Component Efficiency Sensitivity
Objective: Quantify how component efficiencies affect cycle performance
Steps:
- Set baseline: rp = 10, T1 = 300 K, T3 = 1400 K
- Record efficiency at ηc = ηt = 100% (ideal)
- Reduce compressor efficiency to 85%, record new efficiency
- Restore compressor to 100%, reduce turbine efficiency to 85%
- Compare the sensitivity to each component
Expected Result: Both components significantly impact efficiency, but the high back work ratio means compressor efficiency often has a larger effect on net power.
Activity 4: Jet Engine Mode
Objective: Understand how jet engines differ from power-generation gas turbines
Steps:
- Select "Jet Engine" preset (high pressure ratio, high T3)
- Note the very high back work ratio
- Recognize that in a jet engine, the turbine extracts just enough to drive the compressor
- The remaining energy accelerates exhaust gases for thrust
Expected Result: Jet engine configurations show high compression work and high turbine work, with modest "net work" because the energy goes into exhaust kinetic energy rather than shaft power.
Real-World Applications
-
Natural Gas Power Plants - Simple and combined-cycle gas turbines generate over 40% of US electricity, with combined-cycle plants achieving 60%+ efficiency by using exhaust heat for a steam bottoming cycle
-
Aircraft Propulsion - Turbofan and turbojet engines use the Brayton cycle for aircraft propulsion, with high-bypass turbofans powering most commercial aircraft
-
Marine Propulsion - Gas turbines power naval vessels and some cruise ships, offering high power-to-weight ratios compared to diesel engines
-
Industrial Cogeneration - Combined heat and power (CHP) plants use gas turbine exhaust for process heating or steam generation, achieving 80%+ total fuel utilization
-
Pipeline Compression - Gas turbines drive compressors that move natural gas through pipelines, using a fraction of the gas they transport as fuel
Reference Data
| Parameter | Typical Range | Units | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple cycle efficiency | 30 - 40 | % | [3] |
| Combined cycle efficiency | 55 - 62 | % | [3] |
| Turbine inlet temperature (current) | 1400 - 1600 | K | [5] |
| Turbine inlet temperature (advanced) | 1700 - 1850 | K | [5] |
| Compressor pressure ratio (industrial) | 10 - 18 | - | [6] |
| Compressor pressure ratio (aero) | 20 - 45 | - | [6] |
| Back work ratio | 40 - 80 | % | [9] |
| Regenerator effectiveness | 70 - 90 | % | [7] |
Challenge Questions
-
Easy: If an ideal Brayton cycle has a pressure ratio of 8 and γ = 1.4, what is the thermal efficiency?
-
Easy: A gas turbine compressor requires 400 kJ/kg of work input and the turbine produces 700 kJ/kg. What is the back work ratio?
-
Medium: Why does regeneration become less effective as pressure ratio increases? At what condition does regeneration provide no benefit?
-
Medium: A real compressor has 85% isentropic efficiency. If the ideal exit temperature T2s is 600 K and inlet is 300 K, what is the actual exit temperature T2?
-
Hard: A combined cycle plant uses a gas turbine with 38% efficiency and a steam turbine with 35% efficiency. If all gas turbine exhaust heat goes to the steam cycle, what is the combined cycle efficiency?
Common Misconceptions
| Myth | Reality |
|---|---|
| Higher pressure ratio always means higher efficiency | True for ideal cycles, but real cycles have an optimal pressure ratio where net work is maximized. Beyond this, compression losses outweigh efficiency gains. |
| Gas turbines are less efficient than diesel engines | Modern combined-cycle gas turbines achieve 60%+ efficiency, exceeding any diesel engine. Simple-cycle gas turbines (35%) are comparable to diesels. |
| Regeneration always improves efficiency | Regeneration only helps when T4 > T2. At high pressure ratios, this condition may not be met, making regeneration ineffective. |
| The back work ratio is a measure of inefficiency | BWR measures how much turbine work drives the compressor, not losses. High BWR is inherent to gas compression and occurs even in ideal cycles. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the Brayton cycle back work ratio so much higher than the Rankine cycle?
Compressing a gas requires far more work than pumping an incompressible liquid. In the Rankine cycle, the feedwater pump handles liquid water with constant density, requiring minimal work. In the Brayton cycle, the compressor must handle compressible air, and the compression work scales with the temperature rise. Typical gas turbine back work ratios are 40-80%, while Rankine cycle pump work is only 1-2% of turbine output [9].
What limits the maximum temperature in a gas turbine?
Turbine blade materials impose the primary temperature limit. Standard nickel-based superalloys can operate up to about 1300 K. Advanced single-crystal blades with thermal barrier coatings and internal cooling channels push this to 1600-1700 K. Ceramic matrix composites under development may eventually allow temperatures above 1800 K [5].
Why do jet engines use higher pressure ratios than industrial gas turbines?
Aircraft engines optimize for thrust-to-weight ratio and specific fuel consumption rather than thermal efficiency alone. Higher pressure ratios reduce specific fuel consumption for the cruise condition. Modern turbofan engines achieve pressure ratios of 40-50, while industrial gas turbines typically use 10-20 [6].
How does a combined cycle plant achieve 60%+ efficiency?
A combined cycle plant couples a gas turbine (Brayton cycle) with a steam turbine (Rankine cycle). The hot exhaust gases from the gas turbine generate steam in a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The steam turbine extracts additional work from energy that would otherwise be wasted. The combined efficiency is ηcc = ηGT + ηST(1 - ηGT), where ηGT and ηST are individual cycle efficiencies [3].
Can regeneration, intercooling, and reheating all be used together?
Yes, and this configuration provides the highest theoretical efficiency. The RICE (Regenerative, Intercooled, Cooled, with Exhaust heat recovery) cycle combines all these features. However, the added complexity, weight, and cost often outweigh efficiency gains except for baseload power generation where fuel savings justify capital investment [8].
-
MIT OpenCourseWare - Thermodynamics (16.050) - Comprehensive lecture notes on gas turbine cycles and Brayton cycle fundamentals. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/16-050-thermal-energy-fall-2002/ - Creative Commons License
-
HyperPhysics - Brayton Cycle - Clear explanation of cycle processes with diagrams. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/brayton.html - Educational Use
-
Engineering Toolbox - Gas Turbine Efficiency - Reference data on gas turbine and combined cycle efficiencies. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/gas-turbine-efficiency-d_1158.html - Educational Use
-
NASA Glenn Research Center - Brayton Cycle - Technical documentation on gas turbine thermodynamics for aerospace applications. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/brayton.html - Public Domain
-
ASME Journal Review - Turbine Blade Materials - Overview of material limits and cooling technology advances. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ - Open Access Articles
-
GE Gas Power - Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines - Manufacturer specifications for industrial gas turbines. https://www.ge.com/gas-power/products/gas-turbines - Public Information
-
Cengel & Boles - Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach - Standard textbook treatment of regenerative Brayton cycles. Referenced via OpenStax supplementary materials. https://openstax.org/ - Open Educational Resource
-
ScienceDirect - Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles - Technical papers on intercooling, reheating, and combined improvements. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/brayton-cycle - Open Access
-
University of Waterloo - ME354 Course Notes - Detailed comparison of power cycle characteristics. https://www.mhtlab.uwaterloo.ca/courses/me354/lectures/ - Educational Use
-
NIST Chemistry WebBook - Thermophysical properties of air and combustion products. https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ - Public Domain
The thermodynamic calculations in this simulator use air-standard assumptions with constant specific heats (cp = 1.005 kJ/kg·K, γ = 1.4). Real gas turbines use variable properties that change with temperature, but the constant-property model captures the essential physics and matches textbook analysis methods. Efficiency and work values shown are consistent with MIT OpenCourseWare thermodynamics course materials and NASA technical documentation.
Simulations4All. (2026). Brayton Cycle (Gas Turbine) Simulator. Retrieved from https://simulations4all.com/simulations/brayton-cycle-gas-turbine
| Claim/Data | Source | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ideal efficiency formula | MIT OCW 16.050, NASA GRC | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
| Back work ratio 40-80% | Engineering Toolbox, Cengel & Boles | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
| Combined cycle efficiency 60%+ | GE Gas Power, Engineering Toolbox | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
| Turbine inlet temp limits | ASME, GE technical specs | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
| Regeneration effectiveness formula | MIT OCW, Cengel & Boles | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
| Compressor/turbine efficiency equations | NASA GRC, University of Waterloo ME354 | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
| Air properties (cp, gamma) | NIST Chemistry WebBook | ✓ Verified | Jan 2026 |
Written by Simulations4All Team
Related Simulations

Refrigeration Cycle Simulator
Interactive vapor compression refrigeration cycle with P-h diagram, COP calculator, refrigerant selection (R-134a, R-410A, R-290), superheat/subcooling controls, and heat pump mode.
View Simulation
Heat Exchanger Calculator (LMTD/NTU)
Interactive heat exchanger design tool with LMTD and NTU-effectiveness methods, animated temperature profiles, flow configuration selector, and real-time effectiveness charts.
View Simulation
Radiation Heat Transfer Calculator
Interactive radiation heat transfer calculator with Stefan-Boltzmann law, view factor calculations, and blackbody spectrum visualization. Calculate thermal radiation for furnaces, solar systems, and spacecraft applications.
View Simulation